![]() Yup, DZEE I mentioned that already on the first go of this and they are not looking to use TEAMS per OP's comments. Our staff currently has VoIP on a different host and it's not integrated with Teams. We're still looking into something like this ourselves. Word is, even VoIP.ms at $0.85/line/month + minutes now has a Teams integration solution. Note that you do NOT have to buy Microsoft's VoIP solution to integrate with Teams. This may not be the cheapest solution, but if your user base is spread out, the benefits of having immediate and integrated access among your staff via phone and Teams may be worth the additional cost. ![]() If you're using Skype now, does that mean you have O365? You may want to consider systems that integrate with Teams. Some locations are more expensive than others as far as local numbers go so if you want to pm me the specifics I can run some numbers for ya. We have a few of these options in our portfolio that include international dialing (long distance) as well as can provide phone numbers locally anywhere in the world. In this case I'd say the cheapest way to do that is to go with a cloud pbx provider that charges per concurrent call vs per seat. If I'm understanding you correctly, that's pretty much the definition of a cloud pbx. Would be great to give them local numbers (or at least close to the regions they're in). The goal is to have something (like an app/desktop app) that members of our team can access from different devices and locations as a handful of them travel frequently and are often in different countries (meaning they change sim cards often). Just about every tool we use is cloud-based, there's no central location/office. We use slack for our internal comms, so not looking to switch to MS Teams, we use gsuite as our email provider. chan_sip uses the term “guest”.FrickYouPayMe wrote:Are you using Skype PBX and asking about adding DIDs to Skype? If so, are you on legacy 0365/skype or prem? The lack of control means that it is easy to fake caller IDs and make fraudulent calls, that, for example, appear to have originated from within your company.Īnonymous here doesn’t mean that the caller ID is missing, but rather that the immediate upstream source is unknown to you. Also, the lack of control of the format means that they can exploit any vulnerabilities in your system that depend on malformed requests. The risk with allowing anonymous SIP calls is that there is no filtering of the request format, so if you get your configuration wrong, the caller can make outgoing chargeable calls there are a lot of people out there trying to do that, and you will have received calls from them within minutes of being exposed to the internet. In the latter case, many would only accept those calls over a local network or a VPN. In practice, even though SIP allows point to point call setup, businesses only allow calls to come via their service provider, or from devices supplied to their employees. This is my first attempt so I am a complete newbie. NOTICE: res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c:662 log_failed_request: Request 'REGISTER' from '"VoIP.ms" ' failed for '96.9.90.28:56624' (callid: OrRMisvO7t) - Failed to authenticate The registration fails with the following messages: NOTICE: res_pjsip/pjsip_distributor.c:662 log_failed_request: Request 'REGISTER' from '"VoIP.ms" ' failed for '96.9.90.28:56624' (callid: OrRMisvO7t) - No matching endpoint found I used a sample configuration for pjslip provided by VoIP.msĬlient_uri = sip::5060 ![]() I then got ambitious and tried to set up a SIP trunk using VoIP.ms. My Zoiper is being used with another service and I am limited to one account. I got the “Hello, World” sample to work with a Linphone client. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |